Wednesday, 11 April 2012

Masterpiece Theatre: Paradise Towers


Masterpiece Theatre # 2: Paradise Towers

One of the mission statements of this blog is to celebrate the lesser lights of Doctor Who. Stories selected for Masterpiece Theatre must have finished in the bottom 50 of Doctor Who Magazine’s 2009 Mighty 200 survey. Paradise Towers ranked number 193, making it officially the eighth-worst story of all time.


There are several reasons why Paradise Towers has such a low reputation. The chief problem is Richard Briers. As the Chief Caretaker he is actually fine, giving the role the slight sense of officious menace that it requires. Unfortunately by the time the Chief Caretaker is killed and his lifeless body possessed by Kroagnon, Briers makes the decision to go over-the-top when what the situation required was something quieter and more dangerous. What we get is a stupid jerky zombie movement and a silly voice. It undermines the whole story, possibly fatally. Briers doesn’t seem too bothered by this: ‘Doctor Who enabled me to overact, and I enjoy that. The producer worried that I wasn’t taking the role seriously. He thought I wanted to send up Doctor Who. I think he was frightened that I would start overdoing it... so I did!’ Richard Briers, I enjoyed you in The Good Life and even in Ever Decreasing Circles, but you, sir, are a pillock.



The other major problem is the design of the Cleaners. They just aren’t frightening in the way that robots can be. If they had been humanoid in design like the Host in Voyage of the Damned, or the Voc Robots in Robots of Death, they would have been terrifying. Unfortunately what we have is a cheap white plastic-looking wheelie bin that moves slower than a granny on a mobility scooter. There’s no threat to them. They should have been hidden in darkness and only glimpsed. Sadly, they patrol corridors that are lit by merciless BBC lights, so that every penny saved shows up on screen. Howard Cooke, who played Pex, said of them: ‘I thought they were terrible. They were just a joke. The storyline lacked a particularly evil force.’



So has Paradise Towers got any redeeming features? After all, the first Masterpiece Theatre stated that The Power of Kroll was almost Season Twenty-Four bad. For me, though, Paradise Towers is by some distance the best of that season, and there are so many good moments and ideas in it that mean it is ripe for reappraisal. Like all ‘bad’ Doctor Who, it is the execution that is lacking.

Firstly, the actual concept of the story is perfect Doctor Who. A tower block, fallen into ruin, populated by factions in permanent opposition to each other; that’s a great setting and one that should easily have been achievable on a BBC budget, even with the lack of support being given to the programme in 1987. The characters are rich and layered. Just look at the guest cast: Richard Briers, Clive Merrison, Elizabeth Spriggs, Brenda Bruce and Judy Cornwell. All fine actors and all attracted by the strength of the script.

There’s a lovely sense of the grotesque in the imagery and characterisation too, from the foot sticking out of the Cleaner’s trailer to the menacing of Mel with a toasting fork (identical to one my parents had at the time, so there was clearly resonance there) which was risky given the BBC view that Doctor Who needed neutering after the gory excesses of Season 22.




10 Reasons why Paradise Towers builds high for happiness.

1.       Howard Cooke as Pex. Legend goes that Stephen Wyatt wanted an Arnold Schwarzenegger-type for the role and was disappointed when he saw the less-than-muscular Cooke, but that’s precisely what makes Pex such a poignant and ultimately tragic figure. He’s incapable of being a hero, both in his body and in his mind. He’s an object of ridicule, harangued by gangs of teenage girls, and yet he rises to the occasion, giving his life for them, becoming the hero in death that he could never hope to be in life. The image of the Kangs at the end, honouring him is surprisingly powerful and moving.

2.       The Kangs are, to a girl, fantastic. The actresses playing them seem slightly too old to be teenaged, but, actually, that creates the impression that they have trapped in the Towers for a while now, and have had no positive role model to break their endless cycle of gangland violence. Moreover the gang culture is irrelevant and exposed as a pathetic game when people actually die. It is good writing from Wyatt to allow the Kangs to grow up through the story until ultimately they band together and look beyond colour and creed.

3.       Clive Merrison, showing Richard Briers how it should be done. His petty insistence that things should be done by the book gradually falls away into perplexed bewilderment at the actions of his boss and the loss of control in the Towers. His need to find someone else to tell him what to do shows a man without imagination.

4.       Paradise Towers feels like a real place, beyond the confines of what the studio set shows us. The set-dressing is full of incidental detail, and each area feels different. You begin to get the idea that, as the Cleaners advance, the characters are genuinely running out of places to hide, against a foe who designed the building in which they are trapped.

5.       The dialogue is almost Clockwork Orange or Brazil in its design. How about these for starters: Alleviator (elevator), Brainquarters (headquarters), Wallscrawl (graffiti) and Eye-spy (a lookout). It takes the Doctor (and us) time to get to grips with what the Kangs are saying, but by the end of the story their slang-terms make perfect sense.

6.       Sylvester McCoy, finding his feet as the Doctor after the ridiculous Time and the Rani. He invests the Doctor with a burgeoning sense of wisdom and a slippery quality that makes it hard for us to see what he is really thinking. This story lays the foundations for the mysterious, chess-playing, companion-torturing, genocidal Doctor of the next two seasons.

7.       Bonnie Langford has never been anyone’s favourite companion, but her naive insistence that she sticks to her plan and her endearing relationship with Pex show that Mel, serviced with a better writer than Pip and Jane Baker for the first time in her time on the series, is a lot better than she is generally credited.

8.       Cannibalism at teatime. Not only that, but cannibalistic grannies that lure unsuspecting companions in with promises of cake and tea. I wonder how many children looked at their grannies with a degree of suspicion after this story. Paradise Towers plays with the tools of fairy tales and is all the stronger for it.

9.       A 327 Appendix 3 Subsection 9 Death – It’s almost as good as anything dreamed up by Robert Holmes. It doesn’t take much stretching to see the idea in The Sun Makers, for example.

10.   The Doctor abuses the rulebook is just quintessential Doctor Who, solving problems with mind rather than muscle. It’s so refreshing after the Saward-scripted bloodbaths, and shows that Doctor Who was busy rediscovering its mojo. This scene would have been lauded in the Tom Baker or Patrick Troughton eras, and shows Sylvester McCoy taking his first steps to bringing the Doctor back to the man who had been lost for a while; the smartest man in the room.

Much like The Power of Kroll, Paradise Towers has all the elements of good Doctor Who, but the hand dealt to it was an unlucky one. It paved the way for the darker stories of Seasons 25 and 26, and stands out from the dross around it for that precise reason. You can see where it wanted to go, and what it wanted to be. That Paradise Towers doesn’t quite achieve those ambitions is no reason to dislike it. There are many stories worse than Paradise Towers, far more than the seven apparently indicated by the DWM survey. Time for a re-evaluation, methinks. There’s gold hidden in the Towers.

Next time on Masterpiece Theatre: The Keys of Marinus

No comments:

Post a Comment